🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.